The Way the Prosecution of an Army Veteran Over Bloody Sunday Ended in Not Guilty Verdict
January 30th, 1972 remains arguably the most fatal – and significant – dates during thirty years of conflict in the region.
Within the community where it happened – the legacy of that fateful day are painted on the structures and etched in people's minds.
A protest demonstration was organized on a chilly yet clear day in Derry.
The demonstration was opposing the practice of internment – holding suspects without due process – which had been implemented following an extended period of unrest.
Soldiers from the Parachute Regiment killed 13 people in the district – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly Irish nationalist community.
A specific visual became notably iconic.
Pictures showed a clergyman, the priest, displaying a bloodied fabric in his effort to shield a crowd carrying a youth, the fatally wounded individual, who had been mortally injured.
Media personnel documented considerable film on the day.
The archive includes Fr Daly explaining to a media representative that soldiers "gave the impression they would fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the shooting.
That version of the incident wasn't accepted by the original examination.
The initial inquiry determined the soldiers had been attacked first.
In the peace process, Tony Blair's government established another inquiry, after campaigning by surviving kin, who said the initial inquiry had been a cover-up.
That year, the conclusion by the inquiry said that on balance, the military personnel had initiated shooting and that none of the casualties had presented danger.
The then government leader, David Cameron, issued an apology in the Parliament – saying deaths were "improper and unacceptable."
Authorities began to examine the incident.
A military veteran, referred to as Soldier F, was prosecuted for killing.
Accusations were made regarding the fatalities of the first individual, 22, and 26-year-old another victim.
The defendant was also accused of attempting to murder multiple individuals, other civilians, Joe Mahon, an additional individual, and an unnamed civilian.
Exists a legal order preserving the defendant's privacy, which his attorneys have maintained is essential because he is at threat.
He testified the Saville Inquiry that he had only fired at persons who were armed.
The statement was dismissed in the final report.
Evidence from the examination would not be used directly as testimony in the criminal process.
During the trial, the veteran was shielded from sight with a blue curtain.
He spoke for the opening instance in the proceedings at a session in that month, to answer "not guilty" when the accusations were put to him.
Family members of the victims on Bloody Sunday travelled from Londonderry to the judicial building each day of the proceedings.
One relative, whose sibling was died, said they always knew that attending the trial would be painful.
"I visualize the events in my memory," he said, as we walked around the main locations discussed in the case – from the location, where the victim was killed, to the adjacent the courtyard, where James Wray and William McKinney were died.
"It reminds me to where I was that day.
"I participated in moving my brother and put him in the vehicle.
"I went through each detail during the evidence.
"Notwithstanding experiencing everything – it's still valuable for me."