🔗 Share this article

Per a fresh review, dozens of individuals with histories in the energy field have been positioned within the current government, including more than 40 who formerly served straight for oil companies.

Background of the Report

The analysis investigated the backgrounds of nominees and personnel serving in the executive branch and multiple government departments handling climate regulation. These cover major organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency, the Interior Department, and the Department of Energy.

Broader Regulatory Environment

This review comes amid ongoing actions to weaken climate rules and renewable energy supports. For example, latest acts have unlocked large areas of government land for extraction and reduced support for sustainable sources.

Amid the flood of negative actions that have occurred on the environment side... it’s vital to remind the citizens that these aren’t just measures from the nebulous, huge thing that is the administration writ large, stated one analyst participating in the study. It is frequently individual individuals with ties to particular powerful interests that are executing this disastrous pro-industry plan.

Key Discoveries

Analysts discovered 111 employees whom they deemed as energy sector veterans and alternative energy adversaries. This encompasses 43 officials who were directly working by oil enterprises. Included in them are prominent leading executives such as the energy secretary, who previously worked as top executive of a hydraulic fracturing company.

The roster furthermore contains lower-profile administration members. As an illustration, the department responsible for clean technology is managed by a former fracking leader. Similarly, a senior energy consultant in the administration has held senior roles at prominent oil companies.

Further Links

A further 12 officials were found to have ties to industry-backed libertarian policy organizations. These encompass previous employees and fellows of entities that have actively fought clean power and advocated the expansion of traditional energy.

Moreover 29 further appointees are ex- corporate leaders from heavy industry industries whose operations are directly tied to oil and gas. Further individuals have relationships with power providers that sell conventional power or public representatives who have supported pro-oil initiatives.

Departmental Emphasis

Analysts identified that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior alone have links to fossil fuel sectors, establishing it as the highest compromised national agency. That encompasses the leader of the office, who has long taken energy funding and served as a conduit between energy business supporters and the administration.

Political Contributions

Fossil fuel donors contributed sizable funds to the presidential initiative and inauguration. Since entering the White House, the administration has not only implemented pro-fossil fuel rules but also designed benefits and exceptions that favor the industry.

Experience Issues

Alongside energy-connected candidates, the authors found a number of government officials who were appointed to influential roles with scant or no subject matter expertise.

Those officials may not be linked to fossil fuels so directly, but their unfamiliarity is dangerous, stated one researcher. It is logical to think they will be easily influenced, or susceptible individuals, for the energy sector’s agenda.

As an example, the nominee to lead the EPA’s department of general counsel has limited legal background, having not once argued a case to resolution, nor conducted a sworn statement, and not filed a legal request.

During an additional example, a administration assistant working on energy matters arrived to the role after serving in positions disconnected to energy, with no obvious specific field or administrative expertise.

White House Reaction

One spokesperson for the White House criticized the report, stating that the administration’s officials are extremely competent to execute on the public’s mandate to increase American fuel output.

Historical and Current Backdrop

The government oversaw a massive series of anti-environmental steps during its first tenure. In its current term, prepared with conservative agendas, it has initiated a far broader and more aggressive crackdown on climate rules and alternative sources.

There is no shame, stated a analyst. Officials are willing and ready to go out there and promote the fact that they are doing benefits for the oil and gas sector, extractive sector, the mining sector.