🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and grammar: officer-worn camera recordings. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of headlights or flashlights as the police arrive, their faces and voices eloquent of caution or panic or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Non-Fiction Cinema

We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an social media personality by her partner, whose main point of interest was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, made exclusively of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the grim case of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a woman of colour whose children reportedly bothered and antagonized her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the police were summoned multiple times, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Investigation and State Laws

The investigating authorities found evidence that the suspect had done internet searches into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which permit householders and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of danger. The documentary constructs its narrative with the officer recordings generated during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – prefaced by emergency call recordings of the caller calling the police in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The production is presented as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the reality of firearm possession and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a late commentator notoriously said made gun deaths a necessary cost) is not much emphasized.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this aspect. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that didn’t make the edit). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or bread heaters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her local residents a very long time, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another point of comparison, by the way, with the a prior incident). And when she was ultimately formally arrested in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the end titles. A deeply sobering picture of American crime and punishment.